are you really thinking about eliminating all UC-pres related discussions? those will likely be the most active/interesting discussions on the site, so it would be a shame for you guys to cut them....
we're simply discussing how to make them productive. we have worries that anonymous posting will simply lead to anonymous swift-boating that will be unfair and mean-spirited. Don't worry, there will be discussion, we're just trying to figure out how to make it fair and productive... Wow, I am way to responsive tonight. Stillman, are you writing this english paper?
To all the final club douches who are keeping me awake right now with your incessant yelling, I have a message for you. I got into the Walrus Club for Gentlemen, and you didn't. Holy shit, man, I'm in the Walrus Club...and you aren't! This is so sweet. I can't wait to hang out at the super cool, no-girls-allowed Walrus tree house. It's going to be sweet. And you're not in it! Nah nah nuh boo boo.
ah... very glad to hear that you are still going to have UC discussions. my two cents-- allow anonymous posts to stay... sure, it might lead to a little swift-boating (i love that that is now a verb), but i would hope readers are smart enough not to put too much weight in anonymous jabs. when you start censoring comments it's a slippery slope, and you risk losing a lot of legitimacy. and yeah, i'm still plowing through the english paper, still confused as to what 'authority' actually means.... good luck writing yours.
9 Comments:
I can't believe you're taking up valuable blog space with that post.
I can't believe you're taking up valuable comment space with that comment ...
are you really thinking about eliminating all UC-pres related discussions? those will likely be the most active/interesting discussions on the site, so it would be a shame for you guys to cut them....
we're simply discussing how to make them productive. we have worries that anonymous posting will simply lead to anonymous swift-boating that will be unfair and mean-spirited. Don't worry, there will be discussion, we're just trying to figure out how to make it fair and productive... Wow, I am way to responsive tonight. Stillman, are you writing this english paper?
To all the final club douches who are keeping me awake right now with your incessant yelling, I have a message for you. I got into the Walrus Club for Gentlemen, and you didn't. Holy shit, man, I'm in the Walrus Club...and you aren't! This is so sweet. I can't wait to hang out at the super cool, no-girls-allowed Walrus tree house. It's going to be sweet. And you're not in it! Nah nah nuh boo boo.
ah... very glad to hear that you are still going to have UC discussions. my two cents-- allow anonymous posts to stay... sure, it might lead to a little swift-boating (i love that that is now a verb), but i would hope readers are smart enough not to put too much weight in anonymous jabs. when you start censoring comments it's a slippery slope, and you risk losing a lot of legitimacy. and yeah, i'm still plowing through the english paper, still confused as to what 'authority' actually means.... good luck writing yours.
I heard that Andrew G was shadow running John Haddock's campaign - is this true? (or even close?)
damn, now they'll probably erase all UC related messages...
haha. I won't erase that, I can handle a little anonymous rumor.
No, it is not true. I'm not supporting any candidate. Thank you for the question :).
like tumbler and tipsy days hopefully we will remain in high spirits. well, good day
Post a Comment
<< Home