<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/11969108?origin\x3dhttp://cambridgecommon.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

Monday, November 28, 2005

campaign websites

Because the UC campaign began an hour ago, each of the campaign websites are up:
Haddock/Riley www.fixtheuc.com
Voith/Gadgil www.voithgadgil.com
Grimeland/Hadfield www.magnusandtom.com
While you can't put too much stock in such things (Teo and Samita had by far the prettiest website last year and they came in a distant third), the Haddock/Riley website is pretty gorgeous. In any event, the websites give you a basic understanding of their message and who these people are, so enjoy.

---
Please note the UC Campaign-related comments policy.

posted by andrew golis @ 1:05 AM

5 Comments:

At 10:37 AM, Blogger andrew golis said...

Please note, all unsigned comments related to the UC campaign will be deleted.

 
At 1:25 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Interesting, the voithgadgil.com site appears to be password-protected now. Bad time for a re-design! :)

I have to agree on the Haddock site. Visually stunning yet filled with substantive issue discussion.

The Magnus site is good-looking as well, and they have their own blog. It'll be interesting to see what uses they have for it.

-Ben M

 
At 2:36 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 2:52 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You're a wimp, Winthrop.

I'm helping a campaign and I'm on SAC, but you don't see me hiding behind anonymity. I agree that Golis should leave your comment, though. :P

There was a great article in FM that did a rundown of the potential candidates - http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=509027
http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=509033

I don't think that this is a pressing thing for Golis to cover, since we have actual candidates to discuss. Maybe as an interesting election post-mortem if he has time.

-Ben Milder

 
At 5:10 PM, Blogger andrew golis said...

I deleted a post above because no name was attached (other than "wondering in Winthrop). While I appreciate the fact that it was no spreading rumors, and isn't really the reason I've instituted the policy, I really don't want to get into having to make value judgments on what is and isn't allowable other than to ask people to honestly sign their name. Working for a ticket is not a legitimate reason to not sign your name, it's exactly that reason (the reader being able to assess people's motivations, etc.) that I've put the policy in place.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home