<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d11969108\x26blogName\x3dCambridge+Common\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://cambridgecommon.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://cambridgecommon.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d-508380183434548642', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

Sunday, November 06, 2005

sunday open thread

Nothing from me, what are YOU thinking? Hit the comment button and share some wisdom.

5 Comments:

At 12:12 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why anonymity for some, and pervasive use of names for others (in commenting and writing)?

Diversity in service organizations?

Why a picture of aubonpain, of all things, from this Swede?

Do people here tend to read both the Crimson and Cambridge Common? Is it an alternative, supplement, replacement...?

 
At 6:21 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You're wrong. NYT is just as likely to have a Bush admin suck-up piece as it is to write anything progressive.

Golis, any buzz on UC presidential race?

 
At 9:54 PM, Blogger andrew golis said...

I think Matt's going to win a second term!

 
At 7:42 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

forget UC politics, what about the sad state of the race for IOP prez? it’s prob going to be Adam K v. Kevin K. talk about a battle of the midgets. from what i've seen, both are sleazy, unlikable, transparent tools. i can’t imagine anyone being excited about casting a vote for either. they also bring zero diversity to a position that has pretty much ALWAYS been held by white men. i don’t know which scheming loser i should root against. 07 blows. sorry just had to rant.

 
At 12:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

While the IOP choices are somewhat unexciting, I have heard rumors of a VP pick or two that would be a drastic improvement. I guess we'll see.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home